Search results

These standards set out, in general terms, how we expect our registrants to behave. We will use them if someone raises a concern about a registrant’s practice, and for decisions about the character of professionals who apply to our Register.

Information held by the HCPC on Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI)

Panel Members consider information and evidence presented to them to reach well-reasoned and fair decisions on registrants’ fitness to practise cases

Registration assessors assess applications from health professionals who are eligible to apply via the international, EMR or grandparenting application routes

Visitors assess education and training programmes to make a recommendation about whether they meet our standards

#myHCPCstandards​ webinar: standard 4 - delegate appropriately

We recently commissioned Newcastle University to undertake research into what makes clinical and peer supervision effective

Case study: Ellie is a registered Operating Department Practitioner (ODP), who recently started a new job at an NHS Trust. As part of her contract of employment, Ellie is expected to administer drugs intravenously.

Case study: Lilly is a Band 5 registered dietician who works in a community healthcare centre. Lilly has recently been asked by her employer to supervise Isaac, a second-year student dietician, during his practice-based learning.

Our supervision templates provide some examples of how you might want to structure your supervision sessions and the types of conversations you could have.

This tender has now closed. Deadline: 5pm Monday 29 August 2022

Tender to be submitted by 2pm on 16 November 2022

Lead Visitors assess education and training programmes to make sure that they meet HCPC standards

Our Freedom of information (FOI) compliance statistics are published on a quarterly basis. See statistics for 2022.